Why the Solution to the REDPILL Manosphere is BITCOIN

Facebook
WhatsApp
Telegram

Introduction

Alright, let’s get real for a second. Why is a lock that opens for any key a useless, broken lock, and a key that opens any door a master key? This isn’t just some random saying; it’s got depth, and we’re diving right in.

1. Statistical Facts

Every time a woman gets a new penis, her chances of being someone’s forever wife drop1. This isn’t just about the physical stuff, but it hits mentally and spiritually too. Jesus spelled it out in John 4 with the woman at the well, and there’s no second chances even if it’s not her fault (Matthew 5:32, Matthew 19:9 – also covered in Luke 16:18). Romans 7 and Corinthians 7 hammer this home, showing adultery rules are different for men and women. And it’s not just biblical; stats and medical theories back it up. The more partners a woman has, the less likely she is to be a solid wife or mom2 because she gets desensitized to dopamine and oxytocin.

Even having sex with your future wife before marriage can reduce the chances of a successful union3.

Fellas, let’s get real here. A man’s prefrontal lobe isn’t fully developed until he hits the big 3-0. No guy is truly a man before 30, and let’s not forget, even Jesus didn’t start his ministry until after that. Do you think you’re better than Him? The example of Christ is just the tip of the iceberg; this was a well-known fact even in Classical Antiquity!4

Now, let’s dive into some heavy-hitting truths.

2. Hypergamy and Polygyny

Hypergamy5 in women and polygyny in men is a fact, backed by ethno-biological and sociobiological evidence. It’s been confirmed across species, by the number of men and women who left descendants in history, and it’s evident in the likes on dating apps6. This is why most men didn’t leave descendants while most women did – the proportions are strikingly similar to the likes on apps like Tinder7.

Here’s the deal. The majority of men didn’t pass on their genes, while most women did. It’s the same story we see with those likes on Tinder – it’s a numbers game, and the odds have always been in favor of the women. Understand this dynamic and you’ll start to see the dating world for what it really is. Accept reality or serve the devil:

3. SMV(Sexual Market Value)

Look, fellas, here’s the deal. Women are always on the lookout for a man who’s a cut above the rest (that’s hypergamy in action). The internet has only magnified this by giving them access to top-tier guys they’d never meet in real life. So, what’s happening? These ladies are “dating” guys way out of their league—3 to 5 points above them. These men won’t commit, but they’re happy to entertain them for a quick, no-strings-attached fling.

This explains why you hear promiscuous women, who end up with a bunch of cats for company, whining that “men are no good anymore” or “men are too picky.” They’re frustrated because the men they chased—those top-tier guys—only wanted them for easy, occasional hookups. These guys didn’t have to do more than pick up a bill and spend a couple of hours in a motel.

3.1) What are the valuation criteria? Alright, let’s get into the nitty-gritty. A woman’s value is all about her fertility (which boils down to her beauty and youth) and her fidelity (measured by her virginity and pedigree). Simple as that. 3.1.2) For us men, our value is tied to our ability to provide security—whether that’s material, emotional, or financial. That’s why you see women lining up for low-life criminals. Why? Because being with these guys guarantees physical security through the protection of the criminal court.

3.2) Misinformation due to confusion of criteria. Women get this all twisted. They claim “they are picky” and “there are no valuable men for them” because they judge themselves by male criteria. For us men, a woman being “educated,” “independent,” or having a thousand beta males fawning over her is a turn-off. Why? Because it signals that she’s less likely to be faithful. All that attention from betas and alphas just boosts her ego, reducing her chances of being loyal both physically and mentally.

Historically, a woman only needs to maintain her value over time and avoid screwing up to secure a mate and reproduce. A man, on the other hand, gains value or he’s left out in the cold without a family. Most women left descendants; most men didn’t8.

That’s why Mediterranean marriages have worked for millennia (think women aged 14-18 with men aged 33-40). Both partners are at their peak and decline together. This age difference ensures the man’s financial, moral, and psychological dominance, eliminating competition and making sure both fulfill their roles to the fullest. Visual aids (like graphs from Rollo Tomassi) still peg a woman’s peak at 23, though historically it was much younger, around 14-18. These graphs and anecdotal evidence show women lose fertility and other attributes much earlier.

Listen up, guys, because this is a crucial point. An 18-year-old girl who “dates” an 18-year-old boy—without any real long-term commitment, pregnancy, or investment—loses the peak of her potential fidelity and fertility. Fast forward a few years, and her original sexual value gets chopped in half, while his doubles. This sets up an unbalanced dynamic. With no real cost to leave, he’s likely to replace her with a “younger” girl, leaving her high and dry without any compensation or real gain.

Moreover, think about this: do you really believe someone who can’t even support themselves is capable of deciding who they should marry? This is where the myth of “educationalism” kicks in—the belief that formal education raises intelligence, wealth, or productivity and is more important than starting a family, especially for women. This idea wrecks fertility and family structure. Having children later in life results in fewer kids and less intergenerational contact and support. You end up with fewer grandparents or much older ones.

There is no course or training more crucial than marrying early and well when it comes to happiness or material success. The only thing more important than a solid family is spiritual salvation, which is also made easier by a strong family foundation.

Now, let’s talk about the alternative for women left alone at 30-40 years old. They might try to “buy” a husband—a gigolo, really, to play the role of a husband. This is basically prostitution and a reversal of roles, where both parties are likely to end up frustrated. This setup only remains sustainable as long as the woman continues to pay, and the gigolo has no other income alternative.

4. Legal Distortions (Misandric Legislation)

Alright, fellas, let’s dive into why socialism is a wrecking ball for fertility and families. The main culprit? Feminist laws. These laws are the driving force behind the destruction of families and fertility rates. Just look at the fertility rate in ALL socialist and Soviet countries over the past 100 years—it’s proof in the pudding.

Here’s the dynamic: the female chooses whether to give, and the male chooses whether to marry. But with free sex and zero incentive for marriage, the family unit collapses. It’s a one-way ticket to societal decay.

5. Economic-Financial Distortions

Now, let’s talk about welfare. It’s essentially a system designed to siphon money from the producers (mostly males) and hand it over to the parasites (mostly females). When the state steps in as the full provider, the female doesn’t need the male. Just look at who pays more income tax and who receives more of the benefits.

This is why socialism is a fertility destroyer. It dismantles the very fabric that holds society together.

6. Solutions: 

Alright guys, the issue with the misandric bubble was already clear back in 2010, and the solutions were laid out9:

      1. Men’s Exit from Legacy Systems: Men stepping away from outdated systems, causing fiscal erosion and the collapse of corrupt institutions. This move has gained momentum with the rise of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.

      1. Globalization: Seeking wives or adopting children from other countries, or relocating to nations where the laws are less misandric. Look at places where Sharia is applied properly. 

      1. Then there’s the rise of “adult toys” and advancements in virtual reality, hence the MGTOW focus on artificial wombs and Waifus.

      1. Education of the Game: Learning the rules of reality and behaving in ways that align with them.

      1. Extinction of Matriarchal Societies: These societies are being taken over by patriarchies, even weaker ones like Islam. Today, we see this in the Islamic colonization of Europe. Articles show that even if migration stops today, with current fertility rates, most of Europe will be Islamic by 209010.

    The last thing I mentioned was referenced in this video. You can check the description for the script and the numbers, each referencing an article. This one offers a comprehensive report on the causes and consequences of Western misandry. It concludes that misandry is key to “21st-century slavery,” epitomized by the “you will own nothing and be happy” motto of the World Economic Forum.

    The institutional solution is BTC: “Bitcoin fixes it”. Real money leads to real education, food, and relationships. With nothing of value in the legacy system, nothing is lost. Bitcoin erodes fiscal health, reducing the wealth of parasites and the destruction of producers.

    Mircea Popescu, who grasped the misandric issue over a decade ago, said: “Bitcoin is the most conservative thing since Jesus Christ”11. To sum it up: either accept reality or serve the devil, who is the prince of lies.

    Back in the time of Pelopidas and Epaminondas, it was already noted that Sparta’s fertility was insufficient due to excessive privileges and powers granted to women12. One generation later, they were wiped out by the sodomite couples of Thebes13. It doesn’t matter if moving away from God leads to the destruction of institutions (like families) or vice versa, the process is cyclical: “weak men produce hard times, which produce strong men.”

    Even in the animal kingdom, experiments show that when males and females lose their specific values and behaviors (first death), populations tend toward extinction (second death), even with plenty of resources14.

     

    References

    1.Does Sexual History Affect Marital Happiness? https://ifstudies.org/blog/does-sexual-history-affect-marital-happiness…

    2 . There is research indicating that oxytocin receptor gene variants (OXTR) are linked to differences in bonding and attachment patterns in humans (Frontiers).

    The existing body of research suggests that repeated disengagement from emotional bonds—regardless of whether they are from short or long-term relationships—could affect the brain’s response to oxytocin and make forming long-term relationships more challenging. (MDPI) (ScienceDaily).

    When we talk about “repeated disengagement,” this refers to someone going through multiple relationships, each ending in some form of emotional disconnect. This continuous pattern of bonding and then breaking could potentially reduce emotional investment over time. The brain, conditioned by multiple failed or terminated relationships, may not respond to oxytocin in the same way, making it harder to form deep, lasting connections (Frontiers).

    So, it’s not about short-term relationships exclusively, but about the cycle of engaging in multiple relationships—regardless of length—that don’t work out. This could cause the brain to “adapt” in ways that influence how oxytocin facilitates bonding, ultimately making it harder to sustain long-term relationships in the future.

    3. Counterintuitive Trends in the Link Between Premarital Sex and Marital Stability

    https://ifstudies.org/blog/counterintuitive-trends-in-the-link-between-premarital-sex-and-marital-stability…

    4. See Aristotle’s ‘Politics’ and Plato’s ‘The Republic

    5. Hypergamy: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypergamy

    6. Tinder: women get many more matches, but it’s quantity, not quality: https://www.smh.com.au/opinion/why-tinder-makes-us-act-in-genderstereotypical-ways-20170215-gud3we.html

    7. Why Do Women Have the Upper Hand on Tinder?

    https://thebolditalic.com/the-two-worlds-of-tinder-f1c34e800db4

    8. Humanity has (WAY) more mothers than fathers (in EVERY continent).

    https://investigativegenetics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/2041-2223-5-13

    9. The Misandry Bubble: https://www.singularity2050.com/2010/01/the-misandry-bubble.html

    10. When will European Muslim population be majority and in which country?

    https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/PRR-12-2018-0034/full/html

    11. Bitcoin and the poor: http://trilema.com/2012/bitcoin-and-the-poor/

    12. Spartan citizens dropped from 8,000 to just 1,000.

    13. Sacred Band of Thebes: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sacred_Band_of_Thebes14. Universe 25, search for the first “death”: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1644264/pdf/procrsmed00338-0007.pdf

    Articles you might also enjoy reading: